|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| Currently viewing: Assurance processes / Next: Scorecards | ||||||||||||||||
Assurance processesThe group identified two key sustainability measures of its business to be independently assured for the second year in a row. Independent Assurance Report to the Directors and Management of Group Five Limited Introduction We have been engaged by the Directors of Group Five Limited (“Group Five”) to perform an independent assurance engagement in respect of selected Identified Sustainability Information included in Group Five’s Group Risk Officer’s Review and Operational Executive Team’s review incorporated as part of its Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2011 (“the Report”). Scope and subject matter The following Identified Sustainability Information was selected for an expression of limited assurance:
Our responsibilities do not extend to any other information. Responsibilities of the Directors and Management Group Five’s Directors and Management are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Identified Sustainability Information, as incorporated in the 2011 Annual Report, in accordance with their internally defined procedures and for maintaining adequate records and internal controls that are designed to support the reporting process. Responsibility of the independent assurance provider Our responsibility is to conduct a limited assurance engagement and, based on our assurance procedures, report our conclusion to the Directors and Management. We conducted our work in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 Assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. This Standard requires that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the assurance engagement to obtain assurance on the Identified Sustainability Information as per the terms of our engagement. Summary of work performed The defined procedures by which Group Five’s Identified Sustainability Information is generated and aggregated have been applied as assurance criteria. Definitions for the Identified Sustainability Information applied are those determined by Group Five and provided in the Report (refer pages 107 and 160). The procedures selected depend on the assurance provider’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material non-compliance of the Identified Sustainability Information with the criteria. Within the scope of our work we performed, among others, the following procedures:
Inherent limitations The accuracy and completeness of sustainability data is subject to inherent limitations given the nature and methods for determining, calculating and estimating such data. Qualitative interpretations of relevance, materiality and the accuracy of data are subject to individual assumptions and judgements. For a limited assurance engagement, the evidence gathering procedures are more restricted than for a reasonable assurance engagement, and therefore less assurance is obtained than in a reasonable assurance engagement. We have not carried out any work on data reported for prior reporting periods, nor in respect of future projections and targets. We have not conducted any work outside of the agreed scope and therefore restrict our opinion to the Identified Sustainability Information. Conclusion Based on our work performed, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the Identified Sustainability Information selected for limited assurance has not been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the defined reporting criteria. PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. Johannesburg 10 August 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
| back to top ^ | ||||||||||||||||