Financial performance
Overview
Against extremely tough markets conditions, as outlined in the review
from the CEO and the operational reviews, the loss attributable to
equity shareholders of the group for the year ended 30 June 2011 was
R218,1 million (2010: R267,4 million profit). This represents a basic loss
per share of 227 cents (2010: earnings per share of 280 cents).
During the year the group processed an impairment of R521,6 million
net of tax (2010: R293,1 million net of tax) against the long term
carrying value of its property, plant and equipment and goodwill assets
relating to its Construction Materials cluster. This represents the most
material reconciling item between earnings and headline earnings.
The impairment adjustment is discussed below in more detail.
A full reconciliation between earnings and headline earnings is
presented in note 7 on page 211 of the annual financial statements.
Headline earnings for the year ended 30 June 2011 was therefore
R318,9 million (2010: R585,9 million). This represents headline earnings
per share of 332 cents
(2010: 614 cents). The fully diluted headline
earnings per share for the year ended 30 June 2011 was 315 cents
(2010: 561 cents).
The financial statements on pages 184 to 255 set out the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for the group for the
financial year ended 30 June 2011. Segmental information as approved
by the directors relating to the business of the group is set out on
pages 192 to 194.
Group revenue decreased by 18.8% from R11,3 billion to R9,2 billion
due to a reduction in activity levels within the buildings, housing and
civil infrastructure markets, client contract delays and the group’s
decision not to chase volume at the expense of margin. These
conditions, combined with increasing price competition, resulted in
operating profit before fair value adjustments and impairment
adjustments decreasing by 43.1% from R877 million to R499 million.
The group operating profit margin was 5.4% (2010: 7.7%). This was
attributable to the strong results from the Construction cluster and
Infrastructure Concessions, which compensated for the poor
performances in Construction Materials and Manufacturing.

The group’s segmental revenue and margin position for the current year and prior financial year are depicted below:
In the interest of transparent disclosure, the group discloses both its total operating margin, as well as its core operating margin. The core margin is the total operating
margin net of any non-core transactions, such as pension fund surpluses and deficits, fair value adjustments, etc. The margin excluding these transactions is therefore
deemed to be the pure operational margin. The core margin is also reflected within the annual financial statements with the group’s segmental analysis as the executive
committee assesses performance of the segments and clusters on this basis.
Operating margin by cluster
| |
Operating margin by cluster % |
2011 – total
operating
profit |
|
2010 – total
operating
profit |
|
2011 – core
operating
profit |
|
2010 – core
operating
profit |
|
| |
Investments and Concessions |
10.9% |
|
12.7% |
|
11.3% |
|
12.8% |
|
| |
Manufacturing |
3.0% |
|
10.0% |
|
3.0% |
|
9.5% |
|
| |
Construction Materials |
(15.7%) |
|
4.1% |
|
(15.7%) |
|
3.6% |
|
| |
Construction |
6.5% |
|
7.1% |
|
6.5% |
|
6.9% |
|
| |
Total |
5.4% |
|
7.7% |
|
5.4% |
|
7.3% |
|
Fair value adjustments
Investment property, investment in service concessions and investment
in property developments are defined as financial assets held at fair
value, with fair value adjustments through profit and loss designated on
initial recognition.
Investment in property developments
On 1 November 2008 the group acquired a 15% interest in the Waterfall
Development Company (WDC) for R120 million. Through its 22%
investment in Atterbury Investment Holdings, WDC holds the
development rights for approximately 1,4 million square metres
of a new, mainly commercial development to be built between Johannesburg and Midrand (the Waterfall Farm). During the current
year, the group disposed of its interest in WDC, which realised a fair
value upward adjustment of R13,3 million.
Investment properties
The group’s income-producing investment property was independently
valued as at 30 June 2011. In comparing the carrying value to
the independent valuation, a fair value downward adjustment of
R8,4 million (2010: Rnil) was recorded due to movements in
market-related capitalisation rates.
During the year, the group sold its investment in the 114 West contract
in Sandton, realising a fair value upward adjustment of R10,8 million
(2011: Rnil).
Investment in service concessions
The carrying values of the equity investments in service concessions
were assessed. This resulted in upward fair value adjustments of
R19,6 million on M6 (Hungary) and R13,5 million on the A1 Phase I and
II (Poland) totalling R33,1 million. Refer to page 146 for more details.
Pension accounting
An amount of R2,0 million pension fund deficit (2010: R55,2 million
surplus) was recorded against income in F2011 due to the actuarial
valuation performed on the group’s defined benefit pension fund as at
March 2011. The pension fund is a closed fund. In terms of the fund’s
rule amendment, additional surpluses and deficits arising after the
legally required surplus valuation date are for the account of the group.
The group’s surplus apportionment exercise and rule amendment were
approved by the Financial Services Board (FSB). During the prior year,
the group completed the outsourcing of its pensioners from the pension
fund. The fund therefore exists with only active members. The fund’s
overall investment return for the year ended 31 March 2010 was
approximately 23% per annum. This was significantly higher than the
increase in liabilities for the year, which resulted in a sizeable surplus
during the prior year.
Impairment of non-current assets – property, plant
and equipment, including intangible mining assets
and undeveloped mining resources
Accounting practice requires that the carrying value of non-current
assets are reviewed for impairment when there are indicators of
impairment. The weakening market conditions applicable to the
Construction Materials cluster resulted in detailed impairment tests
being conducted.
A lack of clarity on the timing for recovery of construction materials
markets, including no visible recovery in the private residential and
building sector and a delay in contract roll out and awards in the public
sector, required management to apply a prudent consideration to
the carrying value of these assets and to process an impairment of
R325,6 million in the prior year and a further R550,5 million in the
current financial year. Impairment tests performed at year end
indicated that no further impairment adjustments are required.
The R550,5 million impairment adjustment includes a R24,9 million
goodwill write off relating to the acquisition of the group’s cement
extender business in the 2008 financial year.
Finance income – net
In line with expectations, net finance income of R18,4 million was
recorded for the year compared to net finance income of R27,9 million
in the prior year. This consisted of a positive impact from stable interest
rates and a negative impact from the reduction in cash and cash
equivalents. This reduction was mainly realised in the first half of the
financial year.
Taxation
The effective tax rate of 33%, before the Construction Materials
impairment adjustment, was higher than the South African statutory
tax rate of 28%. This was mainly due to Secondary Tax on Companies
paid, liabilities in jurisdictions with higher taxation rates and a
conservative approach adopted in terms of the raising of deferred
taxation assets.
Discontinued operations
During the year, an amount of R17,2 million was charged to the income
statement mainly as a result of a prudent treatment on the amount due
from contract claims and legal costs incurred on a terminated Indian
toll road contract. This balance, which was previously reflected under
discontinued operations, continues to proceed to arbitration.
| The group had to decide whether it
was going to increase order in-take
at potentially low margin and cash
negative returns to cover unutilised
assets or whether it would reduce
the asset base and focus on margin
and cash retention. The group has
clearly communicated its strategy
of choosing to focus on margins
and cash while managing the risk
of losing key capacity. |
|
 |
Cash flow
Operating activities
The group first applies its cash generated from operations to repay
debt and taxation commitments, followed by a return to shareholders in
the form of dividends. Any remaining cash is used to fund capital
investment programmes. This could be debt funded, as the funding
strategy is to match funding to asset type.
During the year, we settled an amount of R254,7 million in taxes. In
addition, dividends to the value of R121,0 million were paid. The group
generated R756,3 million cash from operations before working capital
changes. However, although in line with expectations, working capital
absorption of R1,2 billion resulted in a net cash outflow of R871,0 million
in the period. The material portion of R706,3 million occurred in the
first half of the financial year. As expected and outlined to the market,
the finalisation of the large local infrastructure contracts saw the
unwinding of advance payments and the settlement of creditor final
accounts. Pleasingly, working capital outflows were as a result of the
settlement of trade and other payables only. It continued to improve in
all other areas of trade and other receivables and management of
inventory levels.
At year end, the group reported R788,3 million in advance payments on
hand (2010: R1,1 billion). In addition, an amount of R266 million cash
was held by joint venture partners on behalf of the group. This is
therefore not reflected as cash, but as amounts owing by joint venture
partners. This balance can be converted to cash. Work under-certified
was collected as the balance decreased from R754,5 million at 30 June
2010 to R506,5 million. Refer to the review from the CFO for details on
the changes in working capital structure.
Financing activities
The cash effects of financing activities were due to expansion, as
explained in the debt and gearing section.
Debt and gearing
We are very pleased to report a fourth year of 0% net gearing due to
favourable bank and cash balances on hand. 33% net gearing remains
the group’s maximum target, as mandated by the board. Our short
term and long term liabilities consist of an unsecured domestic bond, finance leases, property funding and limited bank overdrafts. The debt
is mainly variable, linked to JIBAR or prime interest rates. The debt
profile matches the assets being funded. Our operating performance
reduced the group’s dependency on short term borrowing facilities.
As reported previously, in F2007 the group issued two senior unsecured
bonds totalling R850 million which were issued under an approved
R1 billion listed debt management programme. The first instalment
was repayable in February 2010, with the second due in February 2012.
Management has considered the bullet repayments in the forward
looking three-year cash and profit forecasts. In the prior year, the group
settled the GFC 1 bond dated 27 February 2010 for R300 million in cash.
Refinancing of these bonds in future may be considered where
opportunities for investment are identified.
During the year, our capital investment programmes were reviewed and
budgets reduced in light of weak market conditions. Any increase in debt
is as a result of a requirement in capital equipment to accommodate
specific requirements on recently awarded construction and contract
crushing contracts or replacement of capital equipment required.
 |
The Global Credit Rating
agency (GCR) awarded the
group a long term credit
rating of A and a short term
credit rating of A1. |
Investing activities
All existing capital investment projects are required to provide a
targeted return in excess of current weighted average cost of capital
(WACC), which was 12.80% during the year. This rate of return is
applied to all existing projects. New projects are assessed on WACC
based on the cost of new capital. The central treasury funds all capital
projects, which are executed by wholly owned subsidiaries. The central
treasury funding requirements are raised from local debt markets and
take into account the group’s self-imposed net gearing ratio of a
maximum of 33%.

Acquisitions and disposals
There were no business combinations during the current financial year.